What do we consider as the Best solution and Why?
The issue of intersexed children is a very complicated and sensitive one that definitely requires time to reach a more complex and global solution. However, one thing shouts out loud and clear. The fact that there is such large number of intersexed children, with rough gauge of 1 in every 2000 infants, demands an immediate attention of the society.
Having discussed some possible solutions and consequences in the earlier posts, out group has reached the conclusion that postponing the surgical intervention till the baby is old enough to make autonomous decision is the best way out.
The modern medical science, though it has made some incredible breakthroughs, is yet to clearly define the boundaries of intersexed children, let alone assign genders for them. Hence there is high possibility of intersexed children growing up and finding themselves stuck in a gender that they never asked for. About one in every 2,000 births is declared intersex. About five such operations are performed each day in U.S. hospitals on uncomplaining infants who have no chance to participate in or be informed on procedures that will affect their lives, bodies, and future sexual functioning Although considered “compassionate surgery,” in actuality the vast majority of early gender-determining surgeries involve otherwise unremarkable infants who simply have clitorises larger than an arbitrary standard of about 3/8 inch. While it is impossible to imagine boys undergoing surgery because their penises are larger than that of standard size, nonetheless large clitorises are seen as omens of lesbianism, lack of male interest, or unfemininity. But can mere size of genital parts be a determinant of intersex and an influential factor for early surgical intervention? Medicine cannot determine the baby’s “true sex.” For example, chromosomes do not necessarily dictate one’s gender identity, as it is obvious from the fact that most people born with androgen insensitivity syndrome live as women despite having XY chromosomes. In other words: science can measure how large a clitoris is, but cannot conclude how large or small it needs to be. Although doctors do go through careful examination before they actually make surgical changes, they are under constant pressure from the babies’ parents to quickly reach a conclusion. Considering the ambiguity in how intersex children are assigned their genders, as well as the lack of medical technology to accurately define their genders, the true sex of the baby can only be determined when they become sexually aware.
While we consider the argument that if the gender of the child is not decided as soon as possible, the child and his family might go through confusion and possible panic, the recurring cases of people growing up with wrongly assigned sex tell us that we should consider the child’s right and freedom to know and choose for himself what is to be done on his body. We believe that parents and doctors should not rush into assigning a gender for the intersex child if the child is perfectly healthy as it was born. The attempt to alter their genitals into the “ideal medical condition” have resulted in recurring failures and confused children growing up in wrongly assigned sex.
Here is a quote from 16 years old girl, who has been assigned with wrong gender.
“Firstly, The shame and secrecy of early genital surgery never goes away.
“Secondly, the medical community views the world in terms of normal and abnormal. Anything abnormal must be corrected. We are telling the medical community to do nothing, and doctors have difficulty not treating a patient. They should know that their efforts and secrecy do not heal us. They harm us.”
How can we be responsible for those who grow up only to realize that he or she has been assigned a gender which he or she cannot conform to? It tells us that although surgical intervention can alter genitals, but cannot change or reinforce gender or sexual preference. In today’s wildly accepted solution-to carry out early surgical intervention-deprives the children who are most directly affected choice and consent. The surgical alternation should only be carried out under child’s consent when he or she fully understands his or her sexual origins.
While above argument strongly points to the need to postpone any surgical intervention till the child can take full autonomy, how do we explain the choices of parents and doctors who go ahead with early surgical interventions? The biggest concern is that if the child grows up without a specific gender assigned to them, or with genitals that do not conform to modern medical standard, they will definitely face confusion, and have to live in secrecy, or face hostility from society in general. These possible consequences deter parents and doctors from giving the child a freedom to choose their own sex, or what is to be done to their body.
Hence there is a strong need to increase social awareness regarding the intersexed children and society has to be more accommodating to this group of people.
When the society accepts the possible existence of the third sex, and does not discriminate against these people, the surgical intervention can wait till the children can make decisions of their own. There are 1 in every 2000 babies with indistinct gender, and that is a large number. Acknowledging the fact that adults who escaped early genital surgery also experience their own trauma of growing up unique, rather than putting them through the risk of wrong gender assignment and traumas following that, the society has to be more open to this genetic possibility and understand that they are also part of this society and that we should respect their rights and choice.